What went wrong with UNSW Asia?
Posted in The Prophet on May 24th, 2007 by MoleznevAs I was sifting through the stack of papers this morning, the headlines in Home caught my eye, actually it didn't. I just wanted to pick up Home to read it. There were no glaring headlines, you would not have known what happened if you did not read through it. Just after one semester of operation for its soft launch, when its campus was not even ready, UNSW Asia has pulled out.
The Straits Times doesn't seem to be reporting the main reason why it pulled out, except saying that numbers were not enough to meet the target. Of over 700 applicants only 140 were able to enroll, and of these 140, 100 are Singaporeans, while 40 are foreigners. This effectively breaks the agreement between UNSW and the government, as they had previously agreed to a 30% Singaporeans, 70% international student population if you were to refer to this document:
The current negotiations provided for 30% Singapore National and 70% International students to study at UNSW Asia.
This was part of the republic's plan to become an education hub hosting international students and international schools. Singapore is such a small nation, so small that many Americans, known for having lack of general knowledge, does not even know it exist. For that, how will it be able to fulfill that ridiculous number of international students?
I do not believe that just by basing on the numbers for one semester, UNSW would come to a harsh decision to shut down the campus after huge investments or it may be that the Singapore government had spent even more. UB had even fewer students when it first started out. Numbers would eventually grow as there are many Singaporeans out there who wants to send their children to foreign institutions but are worried about them being overseas alone. I believe that the EDB had a part to play in the decision to close UNSW Asia with pressure of numbers of international students.
I also do not think that high tuition fee charged at UNSW Asia is the main issue. Some people are complaining that the fees are the same here in Singapore and UNSW but hey, we at University at Buffalo (UB) in SIM pay the same as what students pay in UB as well. The advertised 60% less than what international students pay in the states accounts for the other expenses. So if people are willing to pay for a prestigious degree from UB which the usual middle and lower wage earners would not have heard about - including myself - they would be willing to pay for a degree which most people - even primary school children - knows.
The other university to receive invitation by the EDB to set up a campus in Singapore was Warwick. The University of Warwick had declined to set up a campus here citing that besides financial issues there were also issues to deal with academic freedom in the republic. As the fiasco continues with students having to complete their semester within a state of uncertainty, I doubt international acclaimed schools would enter Singapore again if the republic chooses to have its stuck up policies.
Discussion from other blogs:
CNA publishes two versions of UNSW Closure Reports
Questions on the UNSW ASIA debacle





