Boeings’ Future, Terminal 3’s Downfall
Posted in The Prophet on June 10th, 2007 by MoleznevHaven't been blogging for the past weeks with researches and assignments being pused by the slave driver ANDREA! Just joking. But even now, while I'm writing this, I'm still searching for reputable free online surveys. So if any of you are kind enough, let me know 6 of them.
As I had mentioned, I was doing Marketing Research for The Boeing Company. The researches led me to put Boeing on the list of companies I worship alongside Trump International, Microsoft, Google. The idea of the 787 Dreamliner simply kicks Airbus' real hard.
The fuss in the whole world with Airbus was about its size. People fail see that with such a big plane, there would definitely be a crowd when it comes to boarding and after landing. Airbus failed to see what people need unlike Boeing which went the extra mile to find out what all parties involved want. The 787 Dreamliner is simply the best aircraft after 747 to be built in history. Unlike any other plane available, it is mid sized, but still able to fly long-haul. Being mid-size meant two key advantages for passengers. Flying point-to-point and lesser crowd to jostle with. At the same time, it provides the same fuel efficiency per seat of A380, with the latter doing it by squeezing people into a plane (economies of scale).
I'm sure you could see the winner here now? If Airbus were to be successful, Changi Airport can of course remain as the top air hub in the world. But looking at the sales of 787, the best selling aircraft to date, survivability of air hubs around the world is quite clear. Considering Singapore's size, the limitations of goods and services, the size of Changi Airport doesn't quite equate the scale.
If an manufacturer could build a plane, solely for the purpose of bringing in parts for the final assembly of its product, I don't see why we should not trust them.
[MEDIA=1]





